Martina Okalova vs Isabelle Haverlag Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In assessing recent performance in second serve situations, Haverlag appears to be at a disadvantage compared to Okalova. Over the past six months, Haverlag has won merely 7.14% of points on their second serve, whereas Okalova has secured 35.19% in the same area. This differential could play a significant role in determining the outcome of their encounter.

When analyzing return game statistics, Okalova again holds the upper hand. Okalova has won 55.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Haverlag has managed 46.15%. This advantage extends to first serve returns, where Okalova leads slightly with a 34.57% success rate compared to Haverlag's 31.43%.

Performance under pressure also favors Okalova. They have successfully saved 36.29% of breakpoints against them, while Haverlag has saved just 25%. This resilience in critical moments can be critical for live betting strategies.

Analyzing their win-loss ratios over the past year, Haverlag has won two-thirds of their matches (66.67%) playing primarily in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with a record of 2/1. Meanwhile, Okalova, while participating at a similar event level, has amassed a 53.57% win rate with a more extensive record of 30/26. This gives Okalova a slight edge in match experience.

Regarding surface preferences, Haverlag has their best career win percentage on indoor hard courts (50%), whereas Okalova excels on clay with a 61% win rate. However, both players perform less impressively on hard courts, although Okalova's win rate of 57% signifies a better adaptation than Haverlag's 31%.

The quality of opponents faced in the past 12 months further supports the notion of Okalova being better tested, as she has competed against opponents with an average rank of 292.75 compared to Haverlag's 338. This, combined with a superior deciding set performance—Okalova winning 48% compared to Haverlag's 0%—suggests Okalova's greater capacity to manage tense match scenarios.

Break point conversion is another critical aspect, with Okalova converting 33.96% of her opportunities compared to Haverlag's 25%. This metric provides insight into each player's ability to capitalize on scoring opportunities during pivotal match moments.

Considering these statistics, Okalova seems poised to emerge victorious in this matchup. With superior stats across various areas of the game, Okalova's overall form, match experience, and ability to perform under pressure suggest she is the likely winner.